When the matter came up before the First Bench, comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M Sunder, the Additional Advocate General sought some more time to produce all relevant records in this connection and to file a counter.
Acceding to the request, the bench said if the counter is not filed by January 9, then the DGP shall be present in the Court. It then posted the matter for next hearing on the same date.
In response, the bench had ruled that the approach adopted in connection with the postings of women inspectors was unacceptable.
On November 21 last, the High Court had initiated suo motu proceedings into the matter.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
