The division bench of Justices Naresh Patil and S B Shukare sought replies from respondents within four weeks.
The other respondents are Union of India, state election officer, secretaries of general administration, agriculture, dairy development, public health and higher education and technical education.
Petitioner Hemant Patil, state coordinator of BSP, argues that respondents issued various orders pertaining to transfers and promotions when the code of conduct was in force.
The petitioner claims he had made a representation to the Election Commission of India, seeking cancellation of these transfers and promotions but no action was taken.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
