Additional Sessions Judge Neena Bansal Krishna reserved the order after special public prosecutor Rajiv Mohan filed written submissions in support of his arguments advanced in the case.
Special Cell of Delhi Police had chargesheeted 42 accused in the case out of which six are absconding.
The investigation conducted by the police in the case had earlier come under scrutiny of the court which had questioned its theory of "match fixing", saying there was prima facie no evidence showing that matches were fixed by the accused.
The prosecutor had said that call detail records (CDRs) clearly reflect the linkage of the accused persons who were part of a crime syndicate to generate money.
Countering the arguments advanced by police, the counsel appearing for the accused had argued that police had failed to show commission of any prima facie offence by the accused in the case.
The defence counsel had also argued that there was prima facie no evidence to frame charge in the case.
Police had told the court that properties of Dawood and Shakeel in Mumbai have already been attached in connection with the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case and that they have not visited India since 1993.
