A Division Bench comprising Justice Krishna Murari and Justice P K Srivastava turned down petitions filed by a number of farmers belonging to Farrukhabad district who had challenged notifications dated and October 19, 2014 and October 30, 2014.
The farmers had contended that the state government had not given the aggrieved farmers an opportunity for hearing as provided under Section 5 of the Land Acquisition Act.
The court, however, was of the view that the proposed construction of highway - for which land was being acquired by way of the impugned notifications - was in "larger public interest".
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
