In a petition to Swaraj, the activists said, "We, the undersigned citizens and residents of Norway, relatives of victims in Norway and activists from around the world, are writing to express our support for your intervention in the matter of the 5-year-old only child of Anil Kumar and Gurvinderjit Kaur who has been snatched by Barnevernet in Oslo, Norway last week."
The group, which included Tomas Zedechovsky, Member of European Parliament (MEP) and former Norway Parliamentarian Jan Simonsen, also alleged that the Barnevernet, the Norwegian child protection authority has for many years been "wrongly" taking children from loving parents in Norway.
Appreciating India's earlier efforts in saving Indian children from Barnevernet and highlighting the human rights abuses of Barnevernet in Norway, the petition urged Swaraj "to spare no effort in enabling the child to be reunited with his family in Norway or repatriated to India where he can be brought up by his extended family in the country and culture of his origin, and to which he has been used since birth.
"This is his right under both Norwegian law and international law."
"We have been campaigning against Norway's cruel child protection regime for years and this year alone there have been protests every month against Barnevernet attended by hundreds in cities around Norway," it added.
Indian national Kaur and her husband, who is a Norwegian national, have alleged that authorities in that country have taken away their son, also a Norwegian national, on a frivolous complaint of abuse.
Swaraj had yesterday said India wants the five-and-a- half-year-old boy united with his natural parents, and refused to accept that foster parents can take better care of the child than the natural parents.
However, Norwegian officials during his meeting with the Indian Ambassador in Oslo had said it was handling the case in accordance with the Norwegian Child Welfare Act which includes directions from the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
They also informed him that since child welfare cases are highly sensitive, the cases are therefore subject to a strict duty of confidentiality.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
