Police 'botched up' rape case, Court orders inquiry

The prosecution case originates from an FIR lodged in 2006 on the complaint of a woman that she was raped by three men

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 24 2013 | 5:20 PM IST
Criticising the "shoddy and unintelligible" probe by Delhi Police in a rape case, a court here has ordered inquiry against the investigating officers to find out if the "botched up investigation was motivated or was due to complete lack of competence".

Additional Sessions Judge Nisha Saxena directed DCP (north east) to inquire the role of investigating officers in a rape case against the accused who were acquitted once and then retried in another criminal case without police having collected any concrete evidence.

"I feel the way and the manner in which investigation was conducted in the instant case in utter disregard of law, calls for enquiry into the actions of concerned police officials to ascertain if it was motivated or was due to complete lack of knowledge/competence," the court said.

The prosecution case originates from an FIR lodged in 2006 on the complaint of a woman that she was raped by three men - Vinod, Suresh and Brahmpal. She said that on the pretext of helping her financially, Vinod, a milk supplier, took her to a jungle in Usmanpur here on March 17, 2006 where he and the co-accused raped her.

However, in her statement recorded by the magistrate, she stated she had falsely accused the trio on the instigation of one Adesh for Rs 3,000 as they had implicated Adesh's brother in a criminal case.

She also said that in pursuance of their conspiracy, Adesh took her to the jungle where she was raped by two men so that her medical examination confirmed the sexual assault.

Based on this statement, the police filed a case against one Ram Kumar whose alias was mentioned as Adesh and his two accomplices Bijender and Nem Singh but could not explain where and when were they arrested.

During trial, the woman again took a somersault and denied all allegations against Adesh, Bijender and Singh leading to their acquittal.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 24 2013 | 5:05 PM IST

Next Story