Safety, efficacy of statins exaggerated: Study

Image
IANS Washington
Last Updated : Feb 22 2015 | 10:45 PM IST

Statins, the cholesterol-lowering drugs prescribed to prevent heart attacks, are not as effective or as safe as we have been led to believe, warn US researchers.

Statins produce a dramatic reduction in cholesterol levels but they have failed to substantially improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Many earlier studies praising the efficacy of statins have not only neglected to account for the serious adverse side effects of the drugs, but supporters of statins have used what the authors refer to as "statistical deception" to make claims about their efficacy.

"The adverse effects suffered by people taking statins are more common than reported in the media and at medical conferences," said David M. Diamond from University of South Florida and Uffe Ravnskov, an expert in cholesterol and cardiovascular disease.

"Statin advocates have used statistical deception to create the illusion that statins are 'wonder drugs,' when the reality is that their modest benefits are more than offset by their adverse effects," they pointed out.

The increased rates of cancer, cataracts, diabetes, cognitive impairments and musculoskeletal disorders more than offset the modest cardiovascular benefits of statin treatment.

The low cholesterol levels related to statin use have frequently been associated with an increased risk of cancer, the authors emphasised.

Most statin trials are terminated within two to five years, a period too short to see most cancers develop.

Moreover, studies have shown a greater incidence of cancer in people who take statins.

Another long-term study even demonstrated a dramatic increase in the incidence of breast cancer among women who had used statins for more than 10 years.

There is a great appeal to the public to take a pill that offers the promise of a longer life and to live heart attack free.

"The reality, however, is that statins actually produce only small beneficial effects on cardiovascular outcomes, and their adverse effects are far more substantial than is generally known," the authors said.

The study appeared in the journal Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 22 2015 | 12:54 PM IST

Next Story