The prime minister went as far as to, in the context of the media, praise his junior foreign minister, the retired general V K Singh — who had, in the course of a spat with the media, declared that they were “presstitutes”. The prime minister himself has, of course, spoken of “news traders” and so on in the past. Mr Modi is entitled to his view of the current state of media ethics — certainly, it is shared by many others. But the anger is nevertheless puzzling. By and large, the media has not only been fair to Mr Modi in the months that he has been in power, it has been downright favourable. This reflects the vast hopes that he carries, especially after the listless and frustrating last years of the United Progressive Alliance. If Mr Modi feels that his government’s good plans – he named the universal housing scheme in particular, as benefiting the poor, but being under-covered – are not drowning out uncertainty or negative reports, he should perhaps consider that more needs to be done, and then the coverage will take care of itself.
What is particularly odd about this blame-the-media campaign is that the National Democratic Alliance government had seemed to suggest that it had no need for the conventional media — that its message could go out through social media and press releases. In effect, if the government feels it is not getting enough good media, has it not brought the problem on itself? Where is its own communication? Where is its media strategy? There is no media advisor; there are no structured press conferences with the prime minister. Even ministers have been silenced, and some of them have even been told not to talk. So how could the government expect its side of the story to completely dominate the airwaves? It should extrapolate from some of its successes in communication. Consider the coal auctions — which, in spite of very real questions about their methods and outcomes, were nevertheless declared a success throughout the media. Why? Because of a sustained strategy, and a minister and officials who were eager to make their case. It will be far more important for the government to deal with the media, instead of just blaming it. Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who headed the BJP-led government at the Centre from 1998 to 2004, had a relaxed approach to media coverage. That is an example Mr Modi should consider emulating.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
