Still a gap

Discrimination against women takes many forms

Image
Edward Hadas
Last Updated : Mar 09 2013 | 12:06 AM IST
Women are paid less than men. That's a fact. The role of discrimination in that situation is harder to analyse.

Women's median pay in OECD countries in 2010 was 15 per cent lower than men's, according to the PwC Women in Work Index. That's down from 19 per cent in 2000, so the trend is clear. But countries differ greatly - the difference is six per cent in Poland and 39 per cent in South Korea. Almost everywhere, women are also more likely to be registered as unemployed, and less likely to hold full-time jobs.

Indisputable discrimination - you receive less pay simply because you are female - undoubtedly explains some of the difference. In many developing countries, this may be the predominant factor.

But almost all countries now prohibit gender-based pay scales, and in most of the richest economies, those laws are actually enforced. Still, the pay gap persists. One reason may be that men are simply and unfairly favoured for promotions - the old boys' club reflex.

Other, more complicated factors are also at play. Many women in developed economies seem to choose relatively low-paid professions, for example in caring work. The lower pay, though, may reflect men's social judgment that women's work is worth less. The easiest way to eradicate this source of lower women's pay is to work on those social prejudices. So far there are few signs of a major shift, but it would be relatively easy to adjust pay scales.

Personal judgments and behaviour is harder to change. Women may work in part-time and lower-stress jobs because they devote more time and energy to family responsibilities. That preference reflects traditional views of gender differences, which are evolving slowly. The result is that women's average pay will be lower than men's as long as a significant number of women want, or are forced, to favour unpaid family labour over paid jobs.

The economic gap between women and men has narrowed dramatically since International Women's Day was created in 1911. In some countries it may have narrowed enough that the simple pay gap is no longer an accurate indicator of injustice. In most others, overcoming the remaining discriminations is a work in progress.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 08 2013 | 9:22 PM IST

Next Story