SC declines to entertain plea for action against intern

The advocate said the allegations made by the intern and published by the website and the daily were defamatory in nature

Media persons outside Supreme Court
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 13 2014 | 5:52 PM IST
The Supreme Court today declined to entertain a petition seeking action against the woman intern for levelling charges of sexual harassment against former apex court judge A K Ganguly.

"We are not inclined to hear the petition," a bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjan Gogoi said while dismissing the petition filed by advocate M L Sharma, who had also sought action against the website and a national daily for publishing the allegations made by the intern.

"We heard you fully and if you have any other remedy under the law you can avail it," the bench said after giving him the opportunity to make his submission.

The advocate said the allegations made by the intern and published by the website and the daily were defamatory in nature.

He claimed that there was a conspiracy to tarnish the image of the judiciary and other retired judges would have to undergo the same ordeal undergone by Justice Ganguly and lately by another former apex court judge Swatanter Kumar against whom also allegations of sexual harassment have been levelled by another intern.

After the bench declined to entertain his petition, the advocate claimed that the entire conspiracy was being promoted by a foreign agency and the woman law officer, who has been spearheading the campaign and making loud noise on the issues of sexual harassment by former judges, was being funded by an American NGO.

After declining the plea of the advocate, the bench adjourned for two weeks the hearing on another petition filed by Attorney General G E Vahanvati on the issue of sexual harassment of the intern.

The Attorney General had filed the petition based on the media reports on November 12, 2013 on the allegations made by the intern, who was the student of West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata.

However, the apex court had suo motu taken cognizance of the reports and constituted a three-judge panel to go into the issue and had kept the petition filed by Vahanvati in abeyance.

The panel had indicted justice Ganguly for his unwelcome behaviour and conduct of sexual nature towards the intern and later he resigned as the Chairman of the West Bengal Human Rights Commission. Justice Ganguly has denied the intern's allegations against him.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 13 2014 | 5:37 PM IST

Next Story