CCI dismisses case against Client Associates

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 07 2018 | 5:00 PM IST

The Competition Commission has dismissed allegations of unfair business practices against private wealth management services provider Client Associates with regard to recovery of salary of an employee post resignation.

Taking a "prima facie" view that no case of contravention of the provisions of either Section 3 or Section 4 of the Competition Act is made out against Client Associates in the instant matter, the fair trade regulator closed the case.

Section 3 and Section 4 pertains to anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant market position, respectively.

The complainant, a former employee of Client Associates, had stated in his complaint that he had tendered his resignation in April 2017 to the firm but withdrew it after getting retention bonus of Rs 50 lakh. Upon re-joining, the company started harassing him and he again resigned in July 2017.

The grievance of the complainant arose when he found out that the company was recovering the revised salary that had already been paid to him for the months of April to June, 2017. It was allegedly recovered from the complainant's remaining salary till September 2017.

The complainant had also provided the Competition Commission of India (CCI) an e-mail wherein Client Associates had stated that he would be relieved from its services with effect from September 2017.

As per the complainant, Client Associates had indulged in unfair practices and misused its dominance.

For the case, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) considered the "market for procurement of services offered by professionals to the private wealth management firms in India" as the relevant one.

The overall market of private wealth management services is very wide and presence of Client Associates would be relatively marginal, CCI said in an order dated June 1.

Noting that Client Associates cannot be held to enjoy dominant position in the relevant market, CCI said it "does not deem it appropriate to analyse the abuse".

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 07 2018 | 5:00 PM IST

Next Story