Consumer Forum rejects claim in a medical negligence case

Image
Press Trust of India Thane (Maha)
Last Updated : Jul 31 2014 | 8:46 PM IST
Thane District Consumer Redressal Forum today rejected a claim of Rs 5.15 lakhs filed by a woman against two doctors of a civic maternity hospital here in a case of alleged medical negligence.
The woman had alleged that due to the negligence of both the doctors during her family planning operation in April, 2004, and its subsequent failure, she conceived again and delivered her third child.
The complainant, Saira Shabbir Sayyed, a resident of Dombivili locality here, had filed a claim of Rs 5.15 lakh against doctors Dr Sridevi Devraj and Dr Jyoti of Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) Civic Maternity Hospital in November, 2007.
The Forum, however, said the complainant failed to substantiate the allegations with proper proof.
In their judgement delivered today, president of the forum Umesh Jhavalikar and member N D Kadam said it cannot be always concluded that such failures are a result of negligence on the part of doctors and there were no proper proofs provided to substantiate the charges.
According to Sayyed's complaint, she had delivered her first baby, which was a Caesarean section, and doctors had suggested her to undergo the tubal ligation (female surgical sterilisation) operation after delivery of her second child.
She underwent the operation at the KDMC civic maternity hospital but it proved to be a failure as she again conceived and delivered her third. Post which, she again underwent the same operation at another hospital and the hospital had issued her a certificate that the first operation was a failure.
The doctors, argued in the court that sometime such operations fail and stated that the couple might not have taken proper protection, hence she conceived again.
The Forum in their order said that simply on the basis of a certificate issued by doctors, citing operation was a failure, negligence is not proved.
They also referred to several of the decisions of the National Council in this regard.
The complainant had claimed a sum of Rs 4.50 lakhs towards compensation, Rs 50,000 towards financial and mental sufferings and also Rs 15,000 towards legal expenses.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 31 2014 | 8:46 PM IST

Next Story