Dec 16 gangrape: SC asks convict to file review petition soon

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 22 2018 | 5:20 PM IST
The Supreme Court today asked one of the four death row convicts in the sensational December 16, 2012 gangrape and murder case to soon file his plea seeking review of its verdict upholding death sentence awarded to him, saying the court "cannot wait" for long.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra was informed that one of the four convicts, Akshay Kumar Singh, has not yet filed the plea for review of the apex court's May 5 last year verdict.
The top court had last year upheld the death penalty to the four convicts - Mukesh (29), Pawan (22), Vinay Sharma (23) and Akshay Kumar Singh (31), saying the "brutal, barbaric and diabolic nature" of the crime could create a "tsunami of shock" to destroy a civilised society.
A 23-year-old paramedic student was gangraped on the intervening night of December 16-17, 2012 inside a moving bus in South Delhi by a gang of six persons and severely assaulted before being thrown out naked. She succumbed to her injuries on December 29, 2012 at Mount Elizabeth Hospital in Singapore.
During the brief hearing today, the court asked advocate A P Singh, who is representing Akshay and two other convicts, as to why review petition has not yet been filed on behalf of Akshay.
Singh told the bench, which also comprised Justices R Banumathi and Ashok Bhushan, that he has filed review pleas on behalf of convicts Pawan and Vinay Sharma but because of some exigencies in Akshay's family, he could not file the same for him.
"This matter cannot go on like this. We cannot wait for you to file review petition for long," the bench observed after which the counsel said he would soon file a review plea.
Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, representing the Delhi Police, also told the bench that much time has gone by since the apex court's May last year verdict.
The bench, while listing the matter for further hearing on February 16, asked Akshay's counsel to file the review plea by then.
The top court had last month heard the arguments on the review petition filed by convict Mukesh which was opposed by the police.
The police had argued that submissions advanced by lawyer appearing for Mukesh does not make out a case for review of the apex court's judgement.
The lawyer representing the convict had claimed that Mukesh was framed by the police and tortured and had also raised other issues, including that of dying declaration of the victim.
Another accused in the case, Ram Singh, had allegedly committed suicide in Tihar Jail, while a convicted juvenile has come out of the reformation home after serving a three- year term.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 22 2018 | 5:20 PM IST

Next Story