HC closes petition by labour outfit

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Feb 24 2015 | 12:45 AM IST
Madras High Court today closed a petition by a labour outfit, seeking a direction to Labour and Employment Department Secretary and to TCS here to implement the labour welfare legislation to the IT sector, in particular to the company and to direct authorities to pass appropriate orders on their January 21 representation.
The First Bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M M Sundresh closed the petition filed by the IT wing of Puthiya Jananaayaga Thozhilalar Munnani when it came up for hearing, rejecting the references made by their counsel on two Supreme Court judgments.
"The case referred by the counsel is one dealt with poor, illiterate and ignorant class of persons who needed protection, while the other one deals with children who are stated to be employed in factories due to their poverty.
"Thus in our view, those two judgments would not have application to the facts in the case, which deal with educated employees of the IT Centre," the judges said.
To a query by the bench on why counsel had not approached the court if he felt the Industrial Disputes Act applies to his clients, he said a representation had already been made to the authorities on January 21, but no action had been taken so far.
The bench then said that in their view, the primary question would have to be decided by the competent authority, whether the IT Industry would be covered by the Act or not, which could only be if the parties concerned approach it under the provisions of the said Act.
"Further if it is not covered, whether it is required to be covered on account of interest of the workmen would be a policy decision to be taken by the Government, which may require legislative changes," it said.
The bench said that in either of the two situations, it would not be appropriate to entertain a PIL which, from its bare reading, was purely a dispute between the employees and the employer relating to TCS.
The bench then closed the writ proceedings, saying it was leaving it to the authorities concerned to take action expeditiously on the petitioner's representation in accordance with law.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 24 2015 | 12:45 AM IST

Next Story