RPI moves Bombay HC seeking to dissolution of Maha Assembly

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Nov 12 2014 | 10:25 PM IST
RPI led by Prakash Ambedkar today moved the Bombay High Court seeking dissolution of the newly-formed assembly in Maharashtra and imposition of President's rule, contending that the government has been functioning "illegally" since November 8.
A division bench of Justices V M Kanade and Anuja Prabhudessai kept the petition for hearing tomorrow.
The petition, filed by 69-year-old Republican Party of India (RPI) Secretary Jairam Pawar, said it was challenging the action of political parties to form government and take oath after the dissolution of the previous legislative assembly.
It said the new assembly had not come into force within the stipulated time prescribed as per the government notification issued on September 20.
The petition said that a notification was issued to dissolve the Assembly on September 20 and the elections were to be conducted as per the electoral programme on October 15. The results were to be declared on October 19.
As per the notification, the earlier legislative assembly was to dissolve on November 8, 2014, and hence the council of ministers was duty-bound to see and ensure that the next legislative assembly should be in place and should be summoned on or before that date, states the petition.
However, the council of ministers took oath on November 10, it said.
Article 163 of the Constitution of India provides that there shall be a council of ministers with Chief Minister as the head to aid and advice the Governor in administration of its functions and discharge of its duties. Article 164(2) makes it clear that the council of ministers is responsible to the legislative assembly, the petition said.
The petition prays the Governor be directed "to remove and or dissolve the council of ministers for the state of Maharashtra and implement the President's rule under Article 356 of the Constitution in the state of Maharashtra."
It further seeks to prohibit the council of ministers from implementing any decision taken by them till appropriate orders are passed by the central and state government in accordance with the Constitution of India.
The petition sought an interim stay on any decision taken by the council of ministers from November 8 till the final order is passed by the High Court.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 12 2014 | 10:25 PM IST

Next Story