SAT sets aside Sebi order against Factorial

The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has set aside markets regulator Sebi's order which had directed Factorial Master Fund to disgorge Rs 20 crore worth of illegal gains made by it through insider trading in the scrip of L&T Finance Holdings.

The decision came after Factorial, a Hong-Kong based firm founded by an Indian-origin banker, moved the tribunal against the Sebi order.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), in an order passed in December 2016, had ordered Factorial to disgorge Rs 20 crore worth of illegal gains made by it through insider trading in the scrip of L&T Finance Holdings.

A Sebi probe had found that Factorial, incorporated in Cayman Islands, had traded in the scrip of L&T Finance Holdings on the basis of its access to unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) related to Offer for Sale (OFS) by Larsen & Toubro in its unit.

On March 13, 2014, Factorial had indulged in unusual and aggressive trading in the L&T Finance scrip a day ahead of the OFS announcement, as per the Sebi order.

In a ruling dated June 29, the tribunal said that Sebi is not justified in holding that Factorial traded in the scrip of L&T Finance Holdings in the F&O segment on March 13, 2014 while in possession of alleged UPSI that L&T had made an application to the regulator March 10, 2014 seeking exemption from the cooling-off period.

As per the tribunal, L&T had sold 1 per cent shares of L&T Finance Holdings (LTFH) in November-December 2013 through OFS and was entitled to sell the balance shares after the expiry of the 12 weeks cooling off period on March 17, 2014.

Factorial, that had participated in the market gauging exercise on March 10, 2014, had every reason to believe that L&T would sell LTFH shares on or after after the cooling off period, it added.

It is not in dispute that during the market gauging exercise, various investors including Factorial had expressed their views demanding deep discount in the shares of LTFH. Therefore, it had every reason to believe that the shares of LTFH would be offered by L&T at a deep discount.

SAT noted, "Sebi is not justified in presuming that the appellant had traded in the scrip of LTFH in the F&O segment on March 13, 2014, while being in possession of the UPSI that L&T would sell the shares of LTFH through OFS imminently."