"The so-called terrorist activities (by the arrested) were a brainchild of the sponsoring authority (police) to elevate the case to an act affecting public order," key accused Roopesh's wife Shyna told the court in a habeas corpus petition.
A division bench, comprising Justice S Tamilvanan and Justice C T Selvam before which the petition came up for admission today, issued notices to central and state governments, returnable by October 12.
Shyna said their arrest itself was illegal because they were not informed of the grounds of arrest and no one close to them was informed of their detention.
She said her right to pursue her own political ideology was violated by police. The grounds of arrest and detention were vague and there was no reason to detain them under NSA, she said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
