Tyrannosaurs were cannibals: study

Image
Press Trust of India Washington
Last Updated : Oct 30 2015 | 2:48 PM IST
A recently unearthed dinosaur bone has unveiled a nasty little 66-million-year-old family secret that tyrannosaurs, including the fearsome T rex, were not shy about eating their own kind, scientists say.
The tyrannosaur bone has peculiar teeth marks that strongly suggest it was gnawed by another tyrannosaur.
The find could be some of the best evidence yet that tyrannosaurs were not shy about eating their own kind, researchers said.
"We were out in Wyoming digging up dinosaurs in the Lance Formation," said paleontologist Matthew McLain of Loma Linda University in California.
"Someone found a tyrannosaur bone that was broken at both ends. It was covered in grooves. They were very deep grooves," said McLain.
The grooves were clearly those of an animal pulling the flesh off the bone - pulling in a direction perpendicular to the bone, in the same way humans eat a piece of fried chicken. But one groove stood out.
It was located at the larger end of the bone and contained smaller parallel grooves caused by the diner's head turning, so that the serrated edges of its teeth dragged across the bone.
Serrated teeth rule out crocodiles and point directly to a theropod dinosaur like T rex.
The fact that the only large theropods found in the Lance Formation are two tyrannosaurs - Tyrannosaurus rex or Nanotyrannus lancensis - eliminates all interpretations but cannibalism, said McLain.
"This has to be a tyrannosaur. There's just nothing else that has such big teeth," said McLain.
The direction of the grooves is consistent with getting flesh from bones off an animal that was quite dead at the time. The bones don't show whether the cannibal was scavenging or was also the killer of the tyrannosaur.
"Exactly who did the eating that day, in the Late Cretaceous, could still be sorted out by the same grooves," McLain said.
The serration grooves are a valuable clue to the size of the animal who owned the teeth.
Previous work using Komodo dragon teeth has demonstrated the relationship between serration sizes and the size of the animal.
This approach has been used on tyrannosaurs, and McLain thinks it will work in this case, too.
"It only works if you know what species it is. And since tyrannosauruses are the only large predators in these formations, it's pretty straightforward," he said.
Even without knowing the size of the eater, it may be easy to say which species of tyrannosaur was eating, because, according to McLain, many paleontologists believe Nanotyrannus were really juvenile T rex.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 30 2015 | 2:48 PM IST

Next Story