Earlier, the CPI leader had accused Moily of favouring Mukesh Ambani-led RIL by pushing for a gas price hike, saying it would cost the exchequer an additional subsidy burden of Rs 76,000 crore. In response to that, Moily had said that an import lobby is working against the gas price hike.
Responding to this, Dasgupta said, “I am not part of any lobby. By the way, the only two companies importing gas in India are two public sector undertakings — GAIL and Petronet LNG. Are they part of the import lobby?”
When Jaipal Reddy was petroleum minister, a fine of $1 billion was imposed on RIL to restrict cost recovery due to shortfall in production up to 2011-12. “An arbitration procedure was about to be initiated, but once Moily has taken over as minister, the process is being stalled and he is sitting on it to favour RIL. The principle of Reddy was that if capital investments have been made for a certain level of production and the same is being done, then we should proportionately reduce the cost recovery permitted,” said Dasgupta.
The 2011-12 penalty was based on principle of reduced production leading to a reduction in capital costs allowed since assets were under-utilised. According to the Dasgupta’s calculation, considering the drop in production to 15 million standard cubic metres per day (mscmd) against the required level of 80 mscmd now, the penalty is likely to touch $3 billion. “No notice for restricting cost recovery based on the falling production of 2012-13 and this year,” he said in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, while asking to impose fresh penalties on the company for falling productions.
Training guns on Moily for inaction in taking back the KG-D6 area according to contract provisions, he said, “The Comptroller and Auditor General had first asked for it. Even the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons had recommended that 86 per cent of the entire RIL area should be relinquished as per provisions of the contract. The petroleum minister is now preparing the ground for over-ruling the DGH saying that he would not like to look into technicalities,” Dasgupta pointed out.
According to him, due to the fall in production from KG-D6, the loss in power production translates into 13,600 mega watt (MW) this year and in terms of potential shortfall in urea production, it would translate into 32.5 million tonnes. He added that this lost production would be substituted by costly imported gas and it would imply a loss of Rs 49,000 crore in the current financial year. “If we look at the total shortfall in the last two financial years and this year, the total loss will translate into Rs 1,10,000 crore,” he added.
Responding to Dasgupta’s allegation, Moily had told Business Standard last week, “If someone thinks that I am here to help Reliance, history will speak against him. I was law minister when there was a legal battle (RIL versus Anil Ambani group’s Reliance Natural Resource Ltd case) in which Reliance was involved. I can very well say that I was responsible for the Supreme Court to lay down a law saying that natural resources belong to the nation. If I wanted to help Reliance or if that lobby played on me, I could have supported them.”
THE FACE-OFF
GURUDAS DASGUPTA
CPI leader
- If Moily’s formulae on gas price is implemented, it would cost an additional subsidy burden of Rs 76,000 crore. Moily is working in favour of Reliance
- I am not part of any lobby. By the way, the only two companies importing gas in India are two public sector undertakings, GAIL and Petronet LNG. Are they part of the import lobby?
- An arbitration procedure was about to be initiated over a penalty of $1 billion on RIL. Once Moily took over as the minister, the process is being stalled and he is sitting on it to favour RIL
M VEERAPPA MOILY
Petroleum minister
- If someone thinks that I am here to help Reliance, history will speak against him
- An import lobby is working against gas price hikes and it is threatening every oil minister
- I was law minister when there was a legal battle (between Reliance Industries and Anil Ambani group’s Reliance Natural Resource Ltd) in which Reliance was involved. I can very well say that I was responsible for the Supreme Court to lay down a law saying that natural resources belong to the nation. If I wanted to help Reliance or if that lobby played on me, I could have supported them
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)