Defence min, MEA played 'passing the parcel'

Image
Aditi Phadnis New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 16 2013 | 12:58 AM IST
Did one arm of the government not take any action despite knowing Finmeccanica might have violated the integrity pact it had signed with the government of India?

This is what the ministry of defence (MoD)’s note on the helicopter purchase deal implies. It suggests an innate governance/administrative flaw in the purchase of defence equipment. This was exacerbated by the fact that while the MoD repeatedly asked the ministry of external affairs (MEA) to act, the MEA kept saying it couldn’t.

When asked if the ministry had anything to say in the matter, an MEA spokesman said, “No. If we have any inter-ministerial issues, we always follow established procedures to address those.”

According to the MoD statement released yesterday, irregularities in procurement were first reported in Italian newspapers in February 2012. Alarmed, the MoD had written to the MEA immediately. The note said the following day, “DG(Acq) in MoD sought a factual report in the matter from our embassy in Rome”. It didn’t state whether the MEA replied to this or not.

Finmeccanica, however, was immediately spurred into action; it wrote to the MoD the bribery reports were unfounded.

Unconvinced, the MoD again wrote to the MEA in April, asking it to check if the charges were correct. In May, the Indian embassy in Rome replied it was impossible to secure the complete facts from the government of Italy, as the matter was sub judice. In July, the MoD suggested the MEA directly contact judicial authorities in Rome. Then, the note suggests, the MEA had to act. In July, it contacted the prosecutor’s office in Naples. Dissatisfied with the limited information, in October, the defence secretary wrote to the secretary (west) in the MEA, possibly because he felt the matter needed to be brought to the notice of his seniors, asking for facts so that the MoD could take action.

The note says the MEA replied it had spoken to the Italian government and was awaiting a response. The MoD said as a British national (Christian Michael) was involved, it might be possible the British government was aware of the matter. In November, the MEA said the British government was waiting for the Italians to act.

Thus, an independent verification of facts by the Indian government fell between the cracks in the meandering correspondence between the MEA and the MoD — until the arrest of Finmeccanica chief executive Giuseppe Orsi and the revelation that several Indians were involved in the overall scheme of things.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 16 2013 | 12:24 AM IST

Next Story