Energy crisis: Engineers blame 'overdependence' on private sector

Say power tariffs would remain low only when the govt utilities accounted for 70% of the total power generation

Virendra Singh Rawat Lucknow
Last Updated : Jul 21 2014 | 10:23 PM IST
A national-level power engineers’ body has blamed faulty policies and “overdependence” on the private sector for the deteriorating state of power sector. In a meeting at Noida, Northern India Power Engineers Federation (NIPEF) warned that overdependence on the private sector had not augured well for the country and there was a need for a “balanced approach.” There has been constant deterioration in the financial health of the power sector and the government was now forced to subsidise even private power distribution companies (discoms), it added.

The federation further suggested power tariffs would remain low only when the central and state government utilities together accounted for 70 per cent of the total power generation. In its resolution, the federation has demanded the Narendra Modi government introduce an energy policy to meet the growing challenges and negate over emphasis on privatisation.

The federation said  two decades of power reforms have failed to ensure adequate supply of electricity, decrease aggregate technical and commercial (AT&C) losses, make the sector profitable, introduce benefits of competition in power generation and distribution by way of reduced tariff and better consumer services. AT&C losses is the total technical loss, commercial loss and shortage due to the non-realisation of total billed amount. Electricity Act (2003) was aimed at reducing losses, improving financial health of the sector and reducing subsidy. However, the financial health of power sector has deteriorated, All India Power Engineers Federation (AIPEF) chairman Shailendra Dubey said. He said while discoms had resorted to loans to meet operational deficits, the state power utilities were caught in a debt trap and the UP Power Corporation Limited (UPPCL) had accumulated losses of over Rs 25,000 crore.

The Federation has  called for a review of the ultra mega power projects (UMPP) and coal allocation policies.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 21 2014 | 8:35 PM IST

Next Story