A CIS entity typically raises funds from the public to invest the money in a project or investment scheme proposed with the capital collected from a pool of investors and the returns are shared on pro-rata basis at a later stage
The regulator has been flooded with complaints of investors being duped by real estate companies promising huge returns in projects proposed to be developed from scratch through public money, prompting it to launch probe against 50-60 such developers, a senior official said. Most of these companies are operating in the northern and western states, while some of them are also active in West Bengal, Assam and other parts of the country, he said.
Sebi is probing whether these companies are operating collective investment schemes (CIS) without registering themselves for such activities with the regulatory authority.
A CIS entity typically raises funds from the public to invest the money in a project or investment scheme proposed with the capital collected from a pool of investors and the returns are shared on pro-rata basis at a later stage.
However, a number of fraudulent CIS entities have been found to be operating in the country over the past many years and many of these come under the radar only after duping the investors of their hard-earned money. Real estate projects appear to have emerged as a favourite for entities operating such fraudulent schemes and complaints in this regard have been pouring in consistently at Sebi, which is mandated to regulate the CIS entities.
Typically in these fraudulent schemes, the companies lure investors into putting in their money for purchase of land and thereafter for development of projects and promise them huge returns at a later stage. The companies even offer to buy back the properties with considerable appreciation to the original investment, but the investors often find them at the receiving end soon after putting in their money, or after being given some small initial returns in certain cases.
In the recent past, Sebi had already taken action against some real estate firms for operating unauthorised CIS schemes, while in some other cases the courts had ruled in favour of actions taken by the market regulator for such fraudulent schemes.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)