“The location of the Gandikota Fort is quite remote. It is a living monument, with many households residing there. We do not want to evict any of them and wish to involve them in the monument’s maintenance. One of our primary tasks will be cleaning up the area as certain parts are being used as open toilets. No one wants to smell ammonia while strolling through the Fort,” said Sundeep Kumar, executive director of Dalmia Bharat group.
There are many similarities between the contracts signed by the Dalmia Bharat group for Red Fort and the Gandikota Fort. Firstly, both contracts are for five years initially, after which they can be extended on mutually agreeable terms by the government and the corporate house. Secondly, many of the proposed interventions are also similar. They include landscaping, provision for drinking water facilities, toilets, installing benches and general illumination of the fort. Thirdly, the indemnity clause for the Gandikota Fort is similar to that of the Red Fort. The government would hold the Dalmia Bharat group “harmless against any loss, costs and expenses” in case such claims are made by the Archeological Survey of India. And lastly, like the Red Fort, Dalmia Bharat will also not charge any “collection fee or convenience fee” from the general public.