Sahara told a bench headed by T S Thakur that it could not sell the two hotels in London and another in New York as Bank of China, which has charge on these, has put hurdles. Therefore, Sahara had found another entity to take over the entire loan and offer a ‘junior loan’. Post-dated cheques are ready and payments will be made to an escrow account, to be immediately transferred to Sebi.
Sahara counsel S Ganesh said the parties to the deals want the Supreme Court’s permission to go ahead. Once granted, at least Rs 5,000 crore will be available and the surplus can be used by Sebi to pay the investors. “Once permission is granted, we will not sit over even one rupee for a moment,” counsel emphasised.
Ganesh mentioned some figures, according to which the company’s properties in Jodhpur and Vasai will bring sufficient amount to fulfil the bail condition. The Aamby Valley is also on offer. However, the company could not get better prices as “unfortunately, the real estate market is at all-time low”. He challenged anyone to get a better price. Therefore, the judges suggested Sebi find an independent agency to take over the deals, so that Sahara gets better prices for its nine domestic properties.
Sahara offered to put all the money it obtained through sale in an escrow account, which will be immediately transferred to “Sahara-Sebi Fund” operated by Sebi.
However, Sebi counsel Pratap Venugopal wanted to examine the escrow agreement. When Sahara said that the escrow account will be managed by a US company, the judges observed that it would not be amenable to Indian jurisdiction. However, they asked Sahara to show the Sebi counsel the terms of the escrow account.
At one stage, the judges remarked that Roy appeared to be “very comfortable” where he was staying, considering the delay in arranging the bail amount. The counsel said: “He is one of the captains of industry and he would not stay even one day more if he could avoid it.”
When the judges asked Sahara how Rs 140 crore in cash was reportedly seized recently from its Delhi premises, the counsel replied that it was meant to disburse wages to employees who have not been paid for three months. The case will be heard next week after reply from Sebi.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)