Indian Hotels Company (IHC), the Tata Group entity which operates Taj brand of hotels, will have to participate in an open auction to protect its ownership of the Taj Mahal Hotel, the 294-room luxury property in the heart of Delhi and popularly called the Taj Mansingh, after the road it is on.
The Supreme Court on Thursday gave its nod to the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC), which owns the land on which the hotel stands, to go for an auction, after years of legal wrangling. IHC said it would participate.
Reacting to the development, the company’s stock price hit an intra-day low of Rs 123.80 at the BSE and then closed at Rs 126, down 1.3 per cent from the previous day. “We respect the decision and intend to participate in the e-auction when it is held,” said a spokesperson.
In January, the SC asked both parties to find an amicable solution to their dispute on lease extension. IHC contended it had invested a lot into building the Taj to its present reputation and should get an extension of the property; NDMC wanted an open auction to get a good price. This dispute has been on for years.
There was no settlement even after the SC advice and there were long arguments before a two-judge bench of P C Ghose and R F Nariman. Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, also a member of the NDMC, was for an auction. IHC has now lost in both the high court and the Supreme Court.
The company was seeking a right of first refusal with regard to the property. However, the Court allowed the plea of NDMC that the Tata company could not be granted this. If the company loses the bid, it will get ‘breathing time’ of six months to vacate the hotel. The court also said the “blemish-free” record of IHC may be taken into account by NDMC while auctioning.
NDMC had earlier hired SBI Caps to conduct an auction. For IHC, the asset is estimated to generate annual revenue of Rs 150 crore, a small portion of its consolidated revenue of Rs 4,590 crore (FY16). The initial cost incurred by it before the hotel became operational in 1978 was Rs 4.61 crore. Additional investments went to modernise the property. A 33-year lease was given at the outset. When this was to expire, six years earlier, the civic body has wanted to call for an auction and IHC demanding a renewal, arguing it had invested heavily to build the place’s reputation.