The fascination for scale started with the first Vibrant Gujarat Summit, in 2003. There have been six editions of it, each surpassing the preceding one in number of investment agreements signed and value of proposals received. Other states have own versions of such summits. But none can match these in terms of scale, signing of agreement, proposals and the attention it gets, says an Ahmedabad-based political analyst.
Scale & speed
Modi's scale obsession is visible in many mega projects, in various stages of execution. One such is the Gujarat International Finance Tec-City, or GIFT. Inspired by the Shanghai model, GIFT, once fully operational, is supposed to replace Mumbai as the country's financial hub. On 900 acres in an area between Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad, with an estimated investment of Rs 78,000 crore, the proposed hub is supposed to create a million jobs by 2020. It is different, though, that the project is yet to catch the fancy of the wizards of the financial world. Occupancy, as a result, is less than 10 per cent in the two completed commercial towers.
Another hallmark of the Modi regime has been speed. So impressed was the then chairman of Tata Group, Ratan Tata, with the speed of decision making that he decided to shift his stuck Tata Nano factory from Singur in West Bengal to Gujarat's Sanand. The state does not come in the way of business decisions, says Anil Gupta, professor at the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.
Is there a vision?
Modi's speed and scale mission has been supported by a well-oiled state machinery, say observers. Modi should be marketing his administrative model, rather than his development model. One of the first things he did as the chief minister was to install swipe machines at government offices to mark attendance. That single decision ensured regular attendance. Government offices in the state operate like corporate offices, with responsibility fixed and timely delivery as the core area, says the political analyst. What keeps government officials on their toes is Modi's system of directly taking feedback from people on service delivery.
The decision making might be faster and doing business in the state easier during Modi's tenure. But has the process been democratic? The opinion is clearly divided. D L Sheth, political scientist and former director of the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, says authoritarian tendencies are quite visible in Modi. Scores of leaders like Keshubhai Patel, Shankarsinh Vaghela and Sanjay Joshi either left the party or were marginalised. Police officers like Kuldeep Sharma, Rahul Sharma, Sanjiv Bhatt, R B Shreekumar and Rajnish Rai were in the line of fire.
Comprehension exercises
Some commentators have compared Modi with Indira Gandhi's style of functioning. Social historian Ramachandra Guha has argued in his column that, like Indira Gandhi, Modi seeks to make his administration an extension of his personality. Social scientist Shiv Vishwanathan, however, says Modi's authoritarianism is different from Gandhi's. While Gandhi's authoritarianism was of the Mother India variety, populist and nationalistic, Modi's is technocratic, driven by the notion of a swadeshi masculine nation.
What has made Modi the way he is? Call it decisive, strong or authoritarian. A long innings with the RSS, where he learnt all his organisational skills? A trip to the Himalayas, where he spent a few years before becoming a fulltime volunteer of the RSS? Incidentally, the mercurial founder of Apple, Steve Jobs, spent seven months in the Himalayas around the same time before launching the company. On his experience, Jobs told his biographer, Walter Isaacson, that the people in the Indian countryside don't use their intellect like we do, they use their intuition instead, and their intuition is far more developed than in the rest of the world. Intuition is a very powerful thing, more powerful than intellect, in my opinion. That's had a big impact on my work. Is Modi also driven by intuition?
Some have a simpler explanation. Many successful politicians following Indira Gandhi have used the same formula as she did. Modi is one of them. He has taken a few pages out of Indira Gandhi's book, says Anand Kumar, professor of sociology at Jawaharlal Nehru University.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)