The situation is unlikely to be different even tomorrow, said a senior leader from Seemandhra. The members and the parties are hard pressed to demonstrate the strongest possible opposition to the bifurcation at least by stalling the House for the initial few days, according to him.
Apart from stalling the proceedings, Seemandhra members also opened a second front to raise strong objections to the Bill for “lack of comprehensive information” among other things outside the House. A group of legislators from the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) gave a letter to Speaker N Manohar listing out various reservations today.
The letter questioned as to why the copies given to members did not contain objectives and reasons. They asked the government to give financial memorandum, explain the consequences of bifurcation, provide all the details of assets and liabilities, government revenue, more specifically, the revenue collected from the city of Hyderabad, project-wise water allocations, region-wise pension liabilities and data on education and employment opportunities etc.
“Without such information and the time for appropriate study on the AP Reorganisation Bill, it will not be possible for discussion by the members,” the letter said.
The Telangana legislators, on the other hand, requested the Speaker to receive the views of the members in writing as those belonging to Seemandhra have not been allowing the House to function. Even while supporting the bifurcation, they too are expected to file written objections with regard to certain clauses in the draft Bill with the help of the Telangana Joint Action Committee (TJAC) headed by Osmania University professor Kodandaram.
Giving the opinions on the Bill in writing was an idea also mooted by chief minister N Kiran Kumar Reddy on Tuesday though he had asked the members of his party from Seemandhra to give reasons for their opposition to bifurcation through written affidavits. Members of other parties from Seemandhra are also expected to give similar affidavits to the Speaker, according to sources.
The legislators’ opposition, even if they are in majority, is therefore, of no consequence as far as the Centre’s decision on the issue of bifurcation is concerned.
However, the written views by them would guarantee the fulfilment of an obligation to elicit their views in the event of continued disruption of the Assembly proceedings, according to political observers.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)