Taxmen to dissect 60 cases in foreign assets disclosure window

Tax authorities find mismatch in declarations made under last year's black money foreign disclosure window and assets owned outside India

Valuation markdowns leave start-up boards nervous
Shrimi Choudhary Mumbai
Last Updated : Oct 18 2016 | 11:25 PM IST
The income tax (I-T) department is scrutinising the declarations of 60 individuals, who, it believes, had made partial disclosure under the black money compliance window last year. These persons might face prosecution, which could result in forfeiture of assets under Income Tax Act.

The I-T department found huge mismatch between the declarations and the assets owned by them outside India.

Last year, a total Rs 4,417 crore was declared by 638 individuals under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Asset) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015, which promised immunity by paying 30 per cent tax and another 30 per cent as penalty. The black money Act had, for the first time, allowed levy of tax in India on assets kept abroad. Tax sleuths are believed to have obtained data about these foreign accounts from various tax havens and have tallied it with disclosures made by the declarants.

The I-T law allows tax authorities to go back 16 years in the case of illicit foreign wealth. The government had recently signed information-sharing pacts with 90 countries, covering automatic exchange of information helping the taxmen to collate more data. For those caught with undeclared overseas assets, the black money law provides for imprisonment, which could be up to 10 years. Plus, the violator will have to pay 30 per cent tax and a penalty of 90 cent, effectively losing all of the undeclared wealth and more, if caught.

“One critical aspect of the disclosure window last year under the black money Act was that if there was suppression or misrepresentation of facts, such declaration would be treated as ‘void’ and negative consequences would follow including prosecution and non-refund of the 60 per cent tax paid. If in a declaration, a person reported only partial undisclosed foreign assets/foreign income, ‘prosecution’ can be launched under the law. In one of the FAQs (frequently asked questions) issued on July 6, 2015, it was clarified by the government that if only a partial disclosure is made, immunity will not be available for the undisclosed assets,” said Sanjay Sanghvi, partner, Khaitan & Co.

The issue of black money, especially alleged stashing of illicit wealth abroad in places such as Mauritius, Cayman Islands and British Virgin Island, has been a matter of political debate for a long time. An unofficial estimate puts the illegal money of Indians stashed away overseas somewhere between $466 billion and $1.4 trillion.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 18 2016 | 11:18 PM IST

Next Story