The Supreme Court today came down heavily on the Centre on the issue of black money hoarders and asked why stud farm owner Hasan Ali Khan and other alleged offenders were not being subjected to custodial interrogation despite probe agencies possessing
sufficient material.
"What the hell is going on in this country," the court asked, while virtually snubbing Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium when he tried to make certain submissions.
The court also ordered that three key ED officials allegedly transferred midway into the probe in a case of alleged foreign exchange violation by Hasan Ali Khan, the Pune-based businessman, be reinstated forthwith. The court called the transfer as unfortunate.
A bench of justices B Sudershan Reddy and S S Nijjar also indicated that if the government fails to act, it would be compelled to appoint a special officer for supervising the probe against the offenders.
The apex court also wanted to know what prevented the government from subjecting Khan and other alleged black money launderers to custodial interrogation.
Khan, who is alleged to have stashed around $8 billion in foreign banks, had been earlier served a notice for a tax demand for about Rs 50,000 crore.
The court castigated the government for failing to interrogate Khan and other alleged offenders despite having sufficient material in the possession of investigators.
"There are instances when minor offenders are shot down for violating Section 144 CrPC, but you don't take any action against these people. We are very sorry. All these people are now free," the bench remarked voicing its dismay.
The bench granted time till Tuesday to the Centre to file its response failing which it said the court would be constrained to pass necessary orders.
The apex court had on February 10, while hearing a petition by noted lawyer Ram Jethmalani and some former bureaucrats on the issue of black money of Indians stashed abroad and its repatriation, had asked the government to ensure that Khan does not
leave the country.
"It is your duty to ensure that he is available to face prosecution," the court had said when Subramanium informed it that Khan is in India and the government is taking all necessary steps against him.
The bench also queried whether Hasan Ali Khan can be made a party to the proceedings before it.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
