Enough Evidence To Frame Charges Against Rao: Cbi

Image
BSCAL
Last Updated : Sep 02 1997 | 12:00 AM IST

The CBI yesterday reiterated before the Delhi High Court that there was enough evidence against the accused, including former Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao, in the multi-crore MPs bribery case and said the trial court had rightly framed charges against them.

Refuting claims of many of the 16 accused, who have challenged framing of charges against them, CBI counsel A K Dutt submitted before Justice Jaspal Singh that there were even eye-witnesses to the transaction of the bribe amount.

Concluding arguments on behalf of CBI, Dutt said the contention of former Karnataka Chief Minister Veerappa Moily claiming no knowledge of the conspiracy regarding bribery was wrong as he had played a key role in arranging the bribe money from his state.

According to law, any role played in the commission of an offence would make the person liable for the entire offence, the counsel said. Citing various high court decisions, the counsel said it has been widely held that MPs and MLAs were public servants even though they did not hold office or there was no appointing authority.

Rao and other accused would reply to the CBI contention today.

The CBI counsel said MPs and MLAs cannot claim immunity under Article 105 of the Constitution for an alleged criminal offence.

He told Justice Jaspal Singh that the petitionerss contention to claim immunity from judicial proceedings in the case was not based on law.

Accepting and giving bribe is a criminal offence and courts have every right under law to take action against the legislators in such offences, Dutt said.

The counsel, defending the decision of the trial court to frame charges against the accused, said the Constitution only safeguards legislators privileges for any act done inside Parliament in regard to their speech and casting of vote.

Paying and accepting bribe in any manner cannot be described as an act done as part of the legislature work, he contended. Dutt further said that MPs and MLAs are public servants within the definition of Prevention of Corruption Act as laid down by Orissa and Delhi high courts in their judgements.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 02 1997 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story