The current installed capacity of Indian solar cell manufacturing is around 1,386 Mw, of which less than 30 per cent is operational. "India's annual demand for solar cells is close to 4,000 Mw, but the operational capacity is just 200 Mw. With the government scaling up targets, domestic manufacturers are nowhere close to meeting this demand," said a renewable energy sector analyst in Delhi.
Close to 75 per cent of Indian solar power projects are built on imported cells from China and the US.
The US filed a case in WTO in 2012 against the domestic content requirement guidelines of the first phase of NSM. Under the stipulated guidelines, solar power project developers were supposed to source 30 per cent of the required equipment from domestic manufacturers.
When the US and some Indian project developers condemned this, the government gave equal shares of projects under the second phase for development from domestic and foreign content.
The Indian government also delayed the official response to the WTO in 2013 as the case was pending with the ministry of commerce after the ministry of new and renewable energy (MNRE) had given its submission.
"The MNRE would still stand by its position that around 15 to 20 per cent of the projects would be built on domestic content. Earlier it was 50 per cent and we have brought it down. We will file a plea again and any amendment in the policy will be only if we lose the case," said a senior MNRE official.
Currently, under the new mission guidelines, separate schemes are earmarked for domestic manufacturers. The 1,000 Mw of solar projects to be built by central PSUs are mandated to be built on indigenous solar cells, and 50 per cent of the projects to be tendered out by Solar Energy Corporation of India would be based on domestic cells.
According to industry estimates, Indian solar panels are 30 per cent costlier than those manufactured in China, the US, Taiwan and the European markets.
IS THE FUTURE BRIGHT?
US-WTO-INDIA SOLAR SAGA
- First case filed in 2012 by the US in WTO alleging DCR to be anti-competitive policy
- It was put on back burner post criticism from the US clean energy NGOs, including Greenpeace International
- JNNSM Phase II saw around 32% projects choosing domestic content
- US solar companies feared decline in exports
- US filed second case against JNNSM at WTO alleging threat to their exports in 2013
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)