Rising inventory a bad news for growth story

Kunal Kumar Kundu
Last Updated : Jun 01 2013 | 3:20 AM IST
India released its Q4 FY13 GDP numbers on May 31 and data have disappointed on the downside. The income-side GDP (GDP at factor cost) clocked an annual growth rate 4.78 per cent, little changed from the upwardly revised 4.71 per cent (from 4.47 per cent) growth recorded in the previous quarter. Given this, it's difficult to say that the economy has indeed bottomed out. In fact, the full year growth rate of 4.99 per cent is the first sub-five per cent growth in a decade.

While the advance estimate of FY13 GDP released in February (and trashed by the government) turned out to be fairly accurate, the data does not give any comfort that the demand destruction that we have been seeing has bottomed out. Domestic demand or Private Final Consumption Expenditure (PFCE) grew at an annual rate of 4.1 per cent, a decadal low. In fact, although manufacturing showed some semblance of recovery during the last quarter of FY13, faltering domestic demand resulted in accumulation of inventory. When one looks at India's expenditure side GDP (GDP at market price) there is a component known as change in stocks/inventory. To understand the effect of inventory on GDP growth, one needs to look at the change in the component 'change in inventory'. When there is inventory accumulation, this change is positive and has a positive impact on the GDP. When there is a drawdown, this change is negative and, hence, negatively impacts the GDP. As the chart shows, all the four quarters of the financial year saw substantial accumulation of inventory.

What this would mean is that if demand levels do not pick up, then India's manufacturing activity might suffer as producers would prefer to draw down on inventories to partially meet demand requirement, rather than manufacture at the same pace. There is also a possibility of the data being revised downward. There are two reasons for that. First, India's expenditure-side GDP grew at 3.2 per cent annual, the lowest since 1991-92. And, the difference between the two different methods of calculation of GDP was as high as 1.8 per cent, the second highest difference in annual growth rates. Second, the figure for statistical discrepancy for FY13 Q4 is inordinately high at Rs 669.23 billion, which is more than four per cent of the Q4 GDP.

The writer is a Delhi-based independent economist


*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 01 2013 | 12:43 AM IST

Next Story