UP powermen warn against privatisation of electricity distribution

Earlier this year too, the powermen had held statewide protests against the alleged move to privatise electricity distribution in four major cities

Virendra Singh Rawat Lucknow
Last Updated : Jul 21 2013 | 4:33 PM IST
The contentious issue of privatisation of electricity distribution in the urban centres of Uttar Pradesh has ‘once again’ come to the fore.
 
The powermen have warned the Akhilesh Yadav government against any such move lest they resort to agitation.
 
The privatisation issue has witnessed several such face offs over the years spanning both previous Mayawati and current Samajwadi Party regimes.
 

Also Read

Earlier this year too, the powermen had held statewide protests against the alleged move to privatise electricity distribution in four major cities viz. Meerut, Ghaziabad, Kanpur and Varanasi. Agra had already been handed over to Torrent Power under the electricity distribution franchisee model during the Mayawati regime.
 
These protests were organised under the aegis of the UP Power Employees Joint Action Committee (JAC), which had warned if the ‘privatisation’ move wasn’t rolled back, the agitation would be intensified and ‘indefinite work boycott’ would start on May 13, 2013.
 
However, the agitation was called off following “assurances” by the state and UP Power Corporation Limited (UPPCL) to powermen, while the government had also taken a tough stance.
 
Now, the ruling SP has, in a statement released by party spokesperson and UP cabinet minister Rajendra Chaudhary, expressed commitment towards the privatisation of power distribution in Meerut, Varanasi and Ghaziabad by year end.
 
Reacting to this, JAC convenor Shailendra Dubey has sought immediate explanation from the chief minister failing which the employees and engineers would be forced to launch stir, for which the state government would be solely responsible.
 
UPPCL has always denied there was any privatisation move saying the plan was to adopt public private partnership (PPP) model in distribution for greater efficiency.
 
On the other hand, JAC maintained the state was trying to privatise high revenue areas as a “policy of privatising the profits and nationalising the losses.”
 
The state government through UPPCL had resolved to undertake the renovation, upgradation, modernisation, strengthening, operation and maintenance of the distribution system and sub-transmission system of the four cities under PPP.
 
The Corporation had solicited ‘request for proposal’ for appointment of technical consultant to prepare a feasibility report for the project in an earlier ad.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 21 2013 | 4:28 PM IST

Next Story