 "NCP opposes move to list another party with same name")
The Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), worried over the outcome of the Lok Sabha elections in Maharashtra due to a Narendra Modi wave and anti-incumbency, is locked in a legal battle to retain its identity. The NCP is opposing a petition filed by one Kumar Kamalesh Krupashankar at the State Election Commission (SEC) for registration of a party called the Rashtrawadi Congress Party.
The NCP, during a hearing at the SEC on Tuesday, said: “Rashtrawadi Congress Party is only the translation of the Nationalist Congress Party, the registered name of our political party into Marathi or Hindi language. Further, the SEC’s order on March 31, 2009, makes it clear that the name of a political party proposed to be registered should not 'resemble the name of a political party already registered with SEC, giving rise to confusion in the minds of general public.”
The NCP was represented by Shivajirao Garje, state general secretary. The SEC has asked the NCP to make further submissions by May 6. The NCP has already submitted 3,000 objections at the SEC against the petition.
Incidentally, the issue was discussed at length at a meeting convened by party chief and Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar with state ministers and leaders on Tuesday.
The NCP argued the impression among the public is that the NCP and the Rashtrawadi Congress Party is one and the same association/group/body of persons. ''Therefore, registration of any party/group/association as a political party with the name ‘Rashtrawadi’ is bound to obviously cause total confusion in the minds of the general public as contemplated by the SEC order delivered in March 2009. Consequently, such registration will be totally illegal and hence impermissible in law,” the NCP said.
According to the NCP, the Central Election Commission had granted registration to it under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, in the name of ''Nationalist'' Congress Party.
''Ours is the only recognised political party in India and nobody else has any right to name themselves either as Nationalist Congress Party of Rashtrawadi Congress Party,'' the party said.
Moreover, the NCP submitted that the SEC has no jurisdiction, power or authority to take any action in this regard and appealed to dismiss the petition.
The NCP, during a hearing at the SEC on Tuesday, said: “Rashtrawadi Congress Party is only the translation of the Nationalist Congress Party, the registered name of our political party into Marathi or Hindi language. Further, the SEC’s order on March 31, 2009, makes it clear that the name of a political party proposed to be registered should not 'resemble the name of a political party already registered with SEC, giving rise to confusion in the minds of general public.”
The NCP was represented by Shivajirao Garje, state general secretary. The SEC has asked the NCP to make further submissions by May 6. The NCP has already submitted 3,000 objections at the SEC against the petition.
Incidentally, the issue was discussed at length at a meeting convened by party chief and Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar with state ministers and leaders on Tuesday.
The NCP argued the impression among the public is that the NCP and the Rashtrawadi Congress Party is one and the same association/group/body of persons. ''Therefore, registration of any party/group/association as a political party with the name ‘Rashtrawadi’ is bound to obviously cause total confusion in the minds of the general public as contemplated by the SEC order delivered in March 2009. Consequently, such registration will be totally illegal and hence impermissible in law,” the NCP said.
According to the NCP, the Central Election Commission had granted registration to it under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, in the name of ''Nationalist'' Congress Party.
''Ours is the only recognised political party in India and nobody else has any right to name themselves either as Nationalist Congress Party of Rashtrawadi Congress Party,'' the party said.
Moreover, the NCP submitted that the SEC has no jurisdiction, power or authority to take any action in this regard and appealed to dismiss the petition.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
SAVE 25%
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Subscribe
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors
Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share
Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor
Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements
Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
SAVE 25%