 "Swamy's claim: Jaitley backs; Amarinder to take legal action")
BJP leader Arun Jaitley today backed the claim by Subramanian Swamy that Amarinder Singh has not disclosed offshore accounts held by his two family members in his nomination papers, a charge on which the Congress leader today threatened legal action.
Jaitley said that his (Swamy's) charge is based on documents.
Swamy's statement is not a vague allegation, Jaitley said adding that it gives details of the trust of which there are Indian beneficiaries. "It also refers to details of certain accounts," he claimed.
Jaitley said the matter should be probed.
"It is for the government of India through its agencies to issue a letter to competent authorities outside asking for details. It is only then that these details can either be confirmed or contradicted. Are the persons named in Swamy's statement willing to waive off all legal rights in favour of the government agencies, asking the government to come out with confirmation or denial"?
Meanwhile, Amarinder asked Jaitley as why was he "so scared" of naming the "important political family in Punjab" which, according to him, "had parked illegal funds abroad by registering a Trust in a tax haven".
"Or is it only because you know that it is all fiction as it has been scripted by you only and circulated for the purpose of elections through hiring the services of a mercenary like Subramanian Swamy who can do anything for a price," he asked.
On Jaitley's statement that matter should be probed, Amarinder said, yes it must be probed and it will be probed as he was "taking the legal action against Swamy".
"I have full faith in our judicial system and that is why I am taking the legal recourse," he said.
"I hope even Jaitley as a lawyer also has faith in the (judicial) system and till then one expects him to exercise restraint rather than riding piggy back on a mercenary no matter even if he has hired him himself and paid a price for it".
Jaitley said that his (Swamy's) charge is based on documents.
Swamy's statement is not a vague allegation, Jaitley said adding that it gives details of the trust of which there are Indian beneficiaries. "It also refers to details of certain accounts," he claimed.
Also Read
"Obviously, nobody expects during election time, the family to admit that it has parked illegal funds in tax havens. But is it enough to say that the allegation is baseless and malicious? The specific details need to be answered," he said.
Jaitley said the matter should be probed.
"It is for the government of India through its agencies to issue a letter to competent authorities outside asking for details. It is only then that these details can either be confirmed or contradicted. Are the persons named in Swamy's statement willing to waive off all legal rights in favour of the government agencies, asking the government to come out with confirmation or denial"?
Meanwhile, Amarinder asked Jaitley as why was he "so scared" of naming the "important political family in Punjab" which, according to him, "had parked illegal funds abroad by registering a Trust in a tax haven".
"Or is it only because you know that it is all fiction as it has been scripted by you only and circulated for the purpose of elections through hiring the services of a mercenary like Subramanian Swamy who can do anything for a price," he asked.
On Jaitley's statement that matter should be probed, Amarinder said, yes it must be probed and it will be probed as he was "taking the legal action against Swamy".
"I have full faith in our judicial system and that is why I am taking the legal recourse," he said.
"I hope even Jaitley as a lawyer also has faith in the (judicial) system and till then one expects him to exercise restraint rather than riding piggy back on a mercenary no matter even if he has hired him himself and paid a price for it".
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
SAVE 25%
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Subscribe
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors
Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share
Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor
Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements
Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
SAVE 25%