PNB’s net profit declined 20.6 per cent to Rs 1,131 crore during the fourth quarter of FY 12-13, against Rs 1,424 crore in the previous year, as it made higher provisioning for non-performing assets. Announcing the result, K R Kamath, CMD, said the bank made Rs 1,722 crore provisioning in Q4, 2012-13, 13.9 per cent higher than Rs 1,512 crore in the previous year’s Q4.
Net NPA of the bank rose to 2.35 per cent of advances in 2012-13 against 1.52 per cent a year ago. The bank’s gross NPAs rose to 4.27 per cent against 2.93 per cent a year ago.
Despite the fall in net and operating profits, PNB shares rose 4.57 per cent at Rs 783.45, as the bank declared higher dividend and NPAs came down sequentially in Q4. While gross NPAs came down to 4.27 per cent in Q4 from 4.61 per cent in Q3, net NPAs fell 2.35 per cent from 2.56 per cent over the period. Provision coverage ratio also improved to 58.83 per cent from 55.97 per cent in this period.
“On the asset quality front, PNB saw an improvement (contrary to market expectations). The bank reported sequential improvement in gross NPA levels by around four per cent. The bank prudently chose to increase its provision coverage ratio over earnings and thereby increased its provisioning expenses by 44 per cent year-on-year,” said Vaibhav Agrawal, vice-president, (research-banking), Angel Broking.
Another state-run lender Indian Bank has reported a drop of 15.4 per cent in net profit to Rs 292.12 crore for the quarter ended March 31 as compared with Rs 345.41 crore, due to higher provisioning, according to the bank management.
T M Bhasin, chairman and managing director, Indian Bank, said provisioning during the last quarter was around Rs 390 crore, while for the whole year, it was Rs 704 crore, towards pension, gratuity fund and provision towards NPA.
Mumbai-based public sector lender Union Bank of India reported a two per cent increase in net profit at Rs 789 crore for the March quarter due to lower margins.
Net interest margin of the bank came down to 2.89 per cent in the fourth quarter from 3.16 a year ago.
“Growth in profits is lesser because margins were under pressure, as cost of funds didn’t come down despite shedding bulk deposits,” said D Sarkar, chairman and managing director, UBI. He said credit growth was not as expected. Yield on advances also came down, and with higher cost of funds created pressure on NIMs, according to Sarkar.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)