Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company, the non-banking financial company (NBFC) arm of Murugappa, had decided to abandon its plans to set up a payments bank two months ago. A Vellayan, executive chairman of the company said it does not make business sense for companies like Murugappa since transaction cost will be hardly anything.
“I reckon that companies, which are going into this, will be only telecom companies or banks that want to retain their customers or have a large customer base. What happened with the platform is that the base has changed very fast. We would have to burn a huge amount of capital even to stay in the business. Probably only four to five players will come into the market and they are either telecom companies or bankers,” said Vellayan.
He added the value proportion the Group can offer should be as attractive as the competitor and if it is not then it cannot play.
N Srinivasan, director (finance), Murugappa Group, added the entire base was different from the time it applied and got in-principle approval.
“We found that it is no longer like a financial inclusion, it is like playing the e-commerce market. You require huge capital and long gestation period,” he said.
The company was expecting to invest about Rs 100 crore in the business and make a sustainable business in two-three years, whereas it found later that it has to pump in more money to meet the losses for at least six-seven years.
The Murugappa Group company was one of the 11 firms that got in-principle approval from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to set up payments banks in the country.
The others were — Reliance-SBI combine; Aditya Birla Nuvo (Idea Cellular); Airtel; Vodafone; Department of Posts; FINO PayTech; Tech Mahindra; National Securities Depository Ltd; Paytm (Vijay Shekhar Sharma); and Dilip Shantilal Shanghvi.
RBI had given licence to these firms on August 19, 2015. The objective of setting up of payments banks was to further financial inclusion. This was to be achieved by providing small savings accounts and payments/remittance services to migrant labour workforce, low-income households, small businesses, etc. Cholamandalam was to use its subsidiary Cholamandalam Distribution Services Limited (CDSL) to establish the payments bank. Now that it has decided not to pursue it, the company will not proceed with the capital infusion of Rs 75 crore in CDSL. It will intimate RBI of its decision in this regard.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)