Wells Fargo board claws back $28 mn more from ex-CEO

Wells Fargo’s board clawed back an additional $28 million from former Chief Executive Officer John Stumpf and canceled about $47 million of ex-community bank head Carrie Tolstedt’s stock options after determining they were among senior managers who failed to heed warnings of spreading sales abuses for more than a decade.

The bank’s executives treated thousands of fired employees as rogues, and then downplayed the mounting terminations as the board began raising questions, according to the results of a six-month probe by a panel of independent directors that was released on Monday. Investigators unleashed much of their harshest criticism on Tolstedt, 57, who was in charge of the unit where employees opened legions of accounts without customer permission. She earlier had been forced to forgo about $19 million in compensation before leaving the bank last year.

“Tolstedt never voluntarily escalated sales-practice issues and, when called upon specifically to do so, she and the community bank provided reports that were generalised, incomplete and viewed by many as misleading,” the authors wrote.

Stumpf, 63, who stepped down as CEO in October, agreed around that time to forfeit $41 million in equity awards built up over his career at the San Francisco-based lender. The board panel clawed back the additional pay because he allegedly reacted too slowly in dealing with the mounting scandal. The 113-page report largely exonerates new CEO Tim Sloan and many deputies.

‘Root causes’

“We believe that the report correctly identified the root causes of the problem, being the sales practices in the community bank,” Board Chairman Steve Sanger said in a call with reporters. “Those are the answers we wanted to find.”

It’s the deepest autopsy yet as Wells Fargo’s leaders seek to rebuild customer and investor trust after the bank agreed to pay $185 million in fines in September, triggering a national scandal. Throughout, the report builds on a narrative that emerged in congressional hearings and press reports: That abuses began many years before the misconduct cited by authorities and then flourished, with senior managers long blaming low-level employees who lost their jobs.