Reservation incentive for marginalised students to enter college, suggests IIM-A study

Vinay Umarji Mumbai/ Ahmedabad
Last Updated : Jun 02 2013 | 10:18 PM IST
In a bid to assist the government in ensuring better participation of marginalised groups in higher education policy, the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad (IIM-A) has come out with a working paper on the same.

Among other things, the paper suggests that the higher education policy could focus on ensuring that students from marginalised groups are able to cross the threshold of higher secondary school to higher education.

Titled 'Access to Higher Education in India: An Exploration of its Antecedents', the working paper is co-authored by Rakesh Basant, faculty member at IIM-A and Gitanjali Sen, assistant professor, School of Education, Shiv Nadar University.

According to the paper, the chances of under privileged groups entering college went higher once they crossed the school threshold as against low chances of a marginalised student making it to college before crossing the higher secondary school.

"Deficits for the under-privileged were found to be significantly lower among the eligible population, even after we control for a variety of other factors. Thus, once persons from under privileged groups cross the school threshold, the chances of them going to college are quite high. Once again, the results of data from other rounds corroborate these empirical conclusions," the paper suggested.

Adding further on the issue, the paper stated, "The importance of the additional control for access to secondary school also supports the argument. Clearly, a better understanding of the constraints on school education is critical if participation in higher education is to be enhanced."

What's more, the paper also analysed the impact of reservation in higher education on the marginalised or under privileged student groups.

"Arguably, reservation in higher education is an incentive to cross the threshold. Similarly, one can argue that job reservation can enhance the incentives to participate in higher education." the paper stated.

Moreover, the paper also raised questions over the efficacy of socio-religious affiliation to be the sole focus of affirmative action.

"Since many factors, other than socio-religious affiliation also influence participation in a significant manner, an exclusive focus on such affiliation for affirmative action seems inappropriate. The importance of economic background as well as that of location highlights the role of the supply side factors in affecting the participation of various groups," it stated.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 02 2013 | 8:18 PM IST

Next Story