MFs upset with salary disclosure norms; but won't challenge Sebi

They cite privacy issues, unwarranted nature of the norm; raise doubts about what purpose will it serve

The logo of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), India's market regulator, is seen on the facade of its head office building in Mumbai
The logo of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), India's market regulator, is seen on the facade of its head office building in Mumbai
BS Reporter Mumbai
Last Updated : Mar 31 2016 | 11:04 PM IST
Executives in India's Rs 13 lakh crore mutual fund industry are upset with a recent rule asking fund houses to disclose salaries of executives earning more than Rs 60 lakh a year.

Fund houses did not anticipate such a move from the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi). They said the decision was unwarranted and did not serve any purpose.

Business Standard spoke to more than a dozen chief executive officers (CEOs) of big, mid-sized and small fund houses. Most of them were unhappy with the regulator's decision.

Also Read

The latest board meeting of the Association of Mutual Funds in India (Amfi) discussed the matter at length but fund houses failed to reach a consensus on how to approach Sebi on the issue.

Dhirendra Kumar, chief executive of fund tracking firm Value Research, said, "I have failed to understand what purpose will such disclosures serve."

A section of CEOs sees no problem in disclosing pay. Since they manage public money there is no harm if investors, distributors and other stakeholders know their pay packages, they feel.

"Companies and banks disclose their executives' salaries. We will be added to the list now," said the managing director of a mid-sized fund house. However, a larger section of executives are not in favour.

"There should not be any issues with disclosures, provided they are relevant. I would have preferred if Sebi had asked us to disclose how much fees we charge investors annually. Any further segregation in terms of employees' salary is unwarranted and unnecessary," said a CEO of a large fund house.

According to another executive, "There is no point in challenging Sebi's decision. However, what will such disclosures achieve other than making headlines?"

None of the executives wished to be named given the sensitivity of the matter.

Fund houses have one month to disclose executives' remuneration for year 2015-16.  Sebi, in its circular, had stated that fund houses had to make disclosures pertaining to a financial year under a separate head, remuneration, on their websites within one month from the end of the financial year.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 31 2016 | 10:44 PM IST

Next Story