Sebi stiffens rule on unauthorised trades

Brokers hail the move but share concerns over increased time and cost of compliance

Sebi stiffens rule on unauthorised trades
Investors say Sebi has taken a very wide view without understanding the nuances.
BS Reporter Mumbai
Last Updated : Sep 27 2017 | 12:27 AM IST
To curb 'unauthorised trades,' the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has directed brokers to maintain evidence of clients placing orders with them.

Such trades are defined as buy or sell orders placed by a broker on behalf of a client without the latter's directive or authorisation. The markets regulator said the evidence may be a physical record from the client, a telephone recording, e-mail from a registered mail address, a log for internet transactions, record of mobile messages or any other "legally verifiable record".

"When a dispute arises, the burden of proof will be on the broker to produce the above records for the disputed trades," goes a Sebi circular.

Many clients allow their brokers access to their accounts and let them trade on their behalf. This leads to a lot of ambiguous trades. Sebi says it receives several complaints from investors regarding unauthorised trade.

"Sebi in the past has taken several steps to tackle the menace...in spite of measures taken, a considerable proportion of investor complaints is of the nature of unauthorised trades," goes the circular.

Brokers say they are not always at fault. "Often clients allow us to operate their accounts. However, if they incur losses, they try to dispute the trade and file a complaint with Sebi. The latest directive will help both the broking community and investors. However, the time and cost of compliance will increase," said an official with a domestic brokerage.

In the current framework, brokers in commodity derivative markets are required to keep evidence of a client placing an order. There is no such requirement in the equity, equity derivative and currency derivative segments.

Sebi says this latest directive will "further strengthen regulatory provisions against unauthorised trades and harmonise the requirements across markets".
POSSIBLE EVIDENCE

A physical record signed by client
A telephonic recording
E-mail authorizing the trade a registered address
Log for internet transactions
Record of mobile messages
Any other “legally verifiable record”

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story