Excavations show a 10th century temple beneath Babri Mosque site : Counsel in Supreme Court

Image
ANI General News
Last Updated : Aug 16 2019 | 7:20 PM IST

On the seventh day of the Ayodhya Babri Masjid land (Title) dispute case in the Supreme Court, senior lawyer C S Vaidyanathan, appearing for Ram Lala Virajman, on Friday said excavations from the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) have found distinctive features of a 10th century temple beneath the Babri Mosque site.

"It was in the ASI report which stated that it finds distinctive features of a 10th-century temple beneath the Babri Mosque site," he told the five-judge Constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi.

The other four judges in the bench were Justices S A Bobde, Ashok Bhushan, D Y Chandrachud and S Abdul Nazeer.

Vaidyanathan also submitted to the apex Court that ASI report shows the mosque was constructed on the ruins of the temple, even using some of the ruins.

"The archaeological evidence, scriptures and other memorabilia hinted that there are distinctive features found associated with the temples of north India," he said.

In another development, Rajender Singh, who claimed to be one of the descendants of Lord Ram and wanted to be a party in the case, filed a petition before the Supreme Court.

Today's arguments were inconclusive and would continue on Monday when Vaidyanathan will argue and on the fact that the temple existsed there.

"He (senior advocate C S Vaidyanathan) basically tried to show before the Supreme Court from the ASI reports that there was a structure prior to demolition of the mosque and that structure was a very nice big huge temple. It was a pillar based monument," said Vishnu Jain, Lawyer of Hindu Mahasabha.

"Also various photographs and evidence which go to prove that there was an existing monument was produced before the Court and the point that there was a temple there was corroborated by ASI documents," he said.

On August 8, a five-judge bench headed by CJI and including Justices D Y Chandrachud, S A Bobde, Ashok Bhushan and S A Abdul Nazeer, had said that it will hear the Ayodhya title dispute case five days in the week -- from Monday to Friday.

The court is hearing appeals against the September 30, 2010 verdict of the Allahabad High Court in the case.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 16 2019 | 7:03 PM IST

Next Story