Hearing in Kathua rape and murder case adjourned for July 18

Image
ANI General News
Last Updated : Jul 17 2019 | 3:15 PM IST

Hearing in the plea seeking death penalty in the Kathua rape and murder of an eight-year-old in Kathua case at Punjab and Haryana High Court has been adjourned for Thursday, advocate Utsav Bains, the lawyer of the victim's family said on Wednesday.

"Today we filed the appeal for death sentence in the Kathua rape and murder case. The court listed the matter with a bunch of other matters for tomorrow, the judge himself said it is a serious case," Bains told ANI here.

Talking about the plea filed by the victim's family he said, "We think justice has not been delivered to the victim. We have appealed for a death sentence on behalf of the victim's father. Life imprisonment is not enough, rape and murder comes under 'rarest of rare' case, therefore in the Kathua case a death sentence must be given."

Over a year after the gruesome rape and murder of an eight-year-old girl in Kathua in Jammu and Kashmir that caused nationwide outrage, a Pathankot court had convicted mastermind Sanjhi Ram and two others for murder, gangrape and conspiracy and sentenced them to life imprisonment while three police officials were found guilty of destroying evidence and given five-year jail terms.

The District and Sessions judge had pronounced the three main accused--Sanji Ram, Parvesh Kumar and Deepak Khajuria--guilty and convicted them under Sections 120 (b) (criminal conspiracy), 302 (murder), 376 (d) (gang rape), 328 (Causing hurt by means of poison), 363 (Kidnapping or maiming a minor), 201 (destruction of evidence) and 343 (Wrongful confinement for three or more days) of the Ranbir Penal Code (RPC).

Police officials Anand Dutt, Sub Inspector, Tilak Raj (Head Constable) and Surender Verma, Special Police Officer, have been sentenced to five years in jail under section 201 of RPC for causing destruction of evidence. They have also been directed to pay Rs 20,000 each.

Bains added Vishal, Sanji Ram's son who had been acquitted by the Pathankot court too should be punished.

"I read the case, chargesheet, trial court judgement and other things related to the case. I feel the alibi given by Vishal Jangotra is not right, he is also a part of the incident according to the witness statements and therefore should be held guilty," Bains said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 17 2019 | 2:52 PM IST

Next Story