NHRC takes cognizance of missing mercy petitions of Bara massacre convicts

Image
ANI New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 20 2014 | 12:55 PM IST

The National Human Rights Commission of India is considering the complaint of Asian Centre for Human Rights against the apparent loss of mercy petitions of four death row convicts, Krishna Mochi, Nanhe Lal Mochi, Bir Kuer Paswan and Dharmendra Singh @ Dharu Singh convicted for killing of 35 persons belonging to the Bhumihar community at Bara village in Gaya district of Bihar on the night of 13 February 1992.

On 8 June 2001, the Sessions Judge, Gaya-cum-Designated Court under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 found them guilty and awarded death sentence. On 15 April 2002, the Supreme Court [Krishna Mochi and Ors Vs. State of Bihar (Appeal (Crl.) 761 of 2001)] confirmed their death sentence though Justice M B Shah had dissented against the award of death sentence.

The prison authorities claimed that Krishna Mochi, Nanhe Lal Mochi, Bir Kuer Paswan and Dharmendra Singh filed mercy petitions with the President of India on 3 March 2003.

However, the "list of mercy petition cases since 1981" received from the President of India by Asian Centre for Human Rights on 28 March 2013 does not show the names of Krishna Mochi, Nanhe Lal Mochi, Bir Kuer Paswan and Dharmendra Singh alias Dharu Singh. In fact, the President of India has not considered the mercy pleas of these four death row convicts till date.

"The apparent loss of mercy pleas of death row convicts Krishna Mochi, Nanhe Lal Mochi, Bir Kuer Paswan and Dharmendra Singh @ Dharu Singh shows the utter callousness of the government of India in handling cases involving life and death. It is perverse and absolute abuse of power," said Suhas Chakma, Director of Asian Centre for Human Rights.

Asian Centre for Human Rights in a separate mercy plea to the President of India requested to commute the death sentences of Krishna Mochi, Nanhe Lal Mochi, Bir Kuer Paswan and Dharmendra Singh @ Dharu Singh to life imprisonment in the light of the Supreme Court judgment dated 21 January 2014 in the case of Shatrughan Chauhan and Anr Vs. Union of India and Ors. [Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 55 of 2013].

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 20 2014 | 12:42 PM IST

Next Story