Following the Pakistan Supreme Court's verdict on Panamagate, the Indian defence experts on Friday characterised it as 'considerable relief' to Nawaz Sharif, while others said it weakened the position of the Islamabad Prime Minister.
"Nawaz Sharif's position has weakened ever since Panama leak appeared in the newspaper and his party also lost considerable support. With this judgement, Sharif's position has further weakened," defence experts Qamar Agha told ANI
Defence expert Uday Bhaskar said that the apex court's verdict has given a big relief to Sharif.
"I would characterise this judgement of Pakistan Supreme Court as providing considerable relief to Nawaz Sharif, because though it was slightly split verdict three judges were in favour of Sharif while two were against. This gives a lot of relief to the Prime Minister as there was no incriminating evidence that would call for further judicial action," he told ANI.
Announcing the much-awaited Panamagate case verdict, the Pakistan Supreme Court yesterday neither gave a clean chit nor a disqualification to Nawaz Sharif, but ordered the formation of a Joint Investigation Team (JIT) to probe how money was transferred to Qatar.
According to the Dawn, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif told reporters outside the court that the verdict was split 3-2.
"They have said what the PM already said in his letter - that a commission should be constituted to investigate the matter," he said.
"We are ready for all kinds of investigation. It has been established today that any evidence or sacrifices given by our opponents in the SC were not enough. We have succeeded," he added.
The Panama Papers, which refer to a massive trove of secret documents leaked from Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca - specialising in helping the global elite stash wealth in offshore tax havens - had said that the Prime Minister's children Maryam, Hasan and Hussain Nawaz "were owners or had the right to authorise transactions for several [offshore] companies."
At least eight offshore companies were found to have links to the Sharif family in the documents that were leaked following which the case was filed by various petitioners - PTI chief Imran Khan, Jamaat-i-Islami emir Sirajul Haq and Sheikh Rashid Ahmed - seeking disqualification of Prime Minister Sharif over his alleged misstatement in his address to the nation on April 5 and his speech before the National Assembly on May 16, 2016.
The petitioners claimed that the Prime Minister lied about the investments made by his children in offshore companies, which led to the acquisition of four apartments in London's upscale Park Lane neighbourhood.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
