The Delhi High Court on Monday issued notice to the Centre and Directorate of Revenue of Intelligence (DRI) seeking an SIT probe into alleged over-invoicing of equipment and fuel imported for power plants by the electricity generating companies of Adani and Essar groups.
A division bench of Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva sought response from the Central government and the DRI by February 7, 2018.
The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed jointly by two NGOs -- Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Common Cause -- who alleged that the power firms belonging to the two groups were allegedly inflating the value of imports for their power plants to siphon money abroad and avail higher power rate compensation.
Prashant Bhushan, appearing for NGOs, claimed that the DRI had earlier unearthed that public and private sector energy companies were siphoning away several thousands crores of rupees abroad.
The PILs added: "Most of these over-invoicing instances have been reported from the power sector, the impact of which is felt by the millions of the electricity consumers in the form of higher tariff."
The petitioners said that they are concerned about the increasing trend of over-invoicing by the private companies in the power sector with huge public interest ramifications.
"In the last three or four years, several major instances of such over-invoicing have been unearthed by the DRI in which several prominent and influential companies are involved. The modus operandi is identical in all these cases.
"The coal or power equipment even though is shipped directly to India, but its invoicing is routed through a different company incorporated abroad which is directly owned and controlled by the promoters of the project in India."
Elaborating the modus operandi, the NGOs, in the pleas, gave an example. They said suppose the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) of power equipment is located in China, but it raises the invoice in the name of a company located in, say, UAE, and the UAE-based company then raises its own invoice by inflating the value on the Indian company. But Chinese OEM ships the equipment directly to India.
The plea added that thus it is clear that such companies have much to hide in the way they have indulged in huge over-invoicing of coal imported from Indonesia in order to siphon off money from India to cheat the consumers and the shareholders.
"The said case is a clear criminal offence and needs a thorough investigation by an SIT."
The CBI had registered a Preliminary Enquiry (PE) based on the DRI showcause notice to Adani in May 2014, however, the CBI apparently closed it without even registering an FIR during the tenure of then CBI Director Ranjit Sinha," the pleas said.
--IANS
gt/him/vd
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
