Madras HC continues stay in MLA disqualification

Image
IANS Chennai
Last Updated : Oct 04 2017 | 8:42 PM IST

The future of the AIADMK government in Tamil Nadu may be known on Monday when the Madras High Court takes up again the petition by the party's 18 rebel MLAs challenging their disqualification.

Posting the matter for October 9, Justice K. Ravichandra Babu asked all the sides to be present and not to seek any adjournment.

The judge also ruled that the previous orders -- barring a floor test by Chief Minister K. Palaniswami and conduct of fresh by-elections in 18 constituencies notified by the Speaker to the Election Commission -- will continue till the case was decided.

Congress leader and Supreme Court advocate Ahishesk Manu Singhvi, representing the camp of dissident AIADMK leader T.T.V. Dinakaran, told the court that the Speaker acted in a partisan manner by taking action against the 18 MLAs.

"We had only gone to the Governor seeking a change of Chief Minister and had never voted against the government on the floor of the House," he said. The Speaker breached the Constitution by holding the MLAs guilty under the anti-defection law.

He demanded to know why the same Speaker had not yet acted against MLAs belonging to former Chief Minister and present Deputy Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam when they voted against Chief Minister Palaniswami in a trust vote in February.

The lawyer representing the rebel MLAs said they were not even served disqualification orders and that they came to know about it through television channels.

"There were no legal proceedings conducted by the Speaker and rules of natural justice were not applied to the MLAs. Even their disqualification was not conveyed to them before the media and official gazette published it," he argued.

Another senior counsel, Aryama Sundaram, who appeared for the Speaker, said the Speaker had filed a detailed counter affidavit strongly denying all the allegations made against him and contended that there was no denial of natural justice.

The Speaker had clearly stated that time was given to the MLAs several times to respond. "We will argue the case when our turn comes," he said.

In a related case, DMK Whip Chakrapani questioned why the 12 MLAs belonging to the Panneerselvam camp were not disqualified even though they had voted against the government in February.

Justice Ravichandra Babu posted that matter to October 12.

While doing so, he did ask why the Speaker appeared to have been very quick in acting against the 18 pro-Dinakaran MLAs but the other MLAs were left untouched.

--IANS

str-vsc/mr/nir

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 04 2017 | 8:32 PM IST

Next Story