The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked the Election Commission to examine the complaint of dismissed BSF trooper Tej Bahadur Yadav whose nomination papers to contest the Lok Sabha polls from Varanasi were rejected by the poll body.
Yadav wanted to contest the election against Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi asked the counsel of the poll body to look into the matter and communicate it to the court on Thursday.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for Yadav, brought an earlier order to the court's attention and informed that during the Model Code of Conduct there is no bar on filing election petitions.
Yadav, dismissed from service in 2017 after he posted a video online complaining about the poor quality of food served at his BSF camp, had entered the poll fray as a candidate of the Samajwadi Party from the Varanasi seat.
He alleged that he was deliberately kept out of the contest to ensure an easy win for Modi from Varanasi.
Yadav, in his petition, contended that the Returning Officer "completely failed to appreciate that he had produced the dismissal letter along with his nomination paper".
The dismissal letter indicated the reason for his dismissal from the BSF as alleged indiscipline and there was no evidence of indulging in corruption or any act of disloyalty to the state, the petitioner said.
Yadav has sought the apex court's direction to set aside the Returning Officer's May 1 order pleading that he be allowed to contest the election from Varanasi. The candidature of Yadav was rejected by the Returning Officer on finding fault with his nomination papers.
Yadav's nomination was rejected as he could not bring on record that his dismissal was not on corruption charges or due to any integrity issues.
"It seems the decision was taken keeping in mind the sensitivity of the contest in Varanasi and to give walkover to the candidate (Modi) of the ruling party (BJP) by disqualifying the petitioner," he contended.
Yadav claimed he was a strong candidate against the prime minister and his popularity was "gaining momentum", and added that is why he was supported by the Samajwadi Party-Bahujan Samaj Party combine in Uttar Pradesh.
Stating that "the mala fide is apparent," Yadav alleged that the Returning Officer had shown haste in deciding on his candidature, adding that the poll official could have at least allowed the Election Commission to respond to his application.
--IANS
ss/kr/bg
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
