TN moves SC for review of verdict in CBI probed cases

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 27 2016 | 9:07 PM IST

The Tamil Nadu government has moved the Supreme Court for a review of its verdict of December 2 last year holding that for remission of sentence and release of a convict in a case probed by the CBI, consultation with the Centre meant concurrence.

A five-judge Constitution Bench by its verdict on December 2, 2015, had said that "consultation" with the Centre meant "concurrence" for the grant of remission of the sentence of the convicts in the cases investigated by the CBI.

The top court had pronounced this while answering in affirmative the question "Whether the expression 'Consultation' stipulated in Section 435(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure implies 'Concurrence'?"

The issue arose after the Centre challenged the Tamil Nadu government's decision to grant remission of sentence and release of V. Sriharan alias Murugan, A.G. Perarivalan alias Arivu and T. Suthendraraja alias Santhan who were convicted in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination conspiracy case.

The Tamil Nadu government decided to grant remission of sentence and release V. Sriharan alias Murugan, A.G. Perarivalan alias Arivu and T. Suthendraraja alias Santhan after the top court by its February 18, 2014, verdict commuted their death sentence to life imprisonment on the grounds of inordinate delay of 11 years in deciding their mercy plea by the President.

The court said that delay of 11 years was unreasonable and de-humanizing.

The others who were sought to be released included Jayakumar, Nalini and Ravichandran.

The day after the apex court verdict, the Tamil Nadu government in a suo motu decision on February 19, 2014, wrote a letter to the Centre proposing to remit the sentence of convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination conspiracy case.

The decision of the Tamil Nadu government to grant remission and release the convicts was contested by the Centre, which said the state government could not release the convicts in cases investigated by the CBI without its nod.

The three-judge bench headed by then Chief Justice P. Sathasivan (now Governor of Kerala) referred to the Constitution Bench the seven questions, including whether "consultation" with the Centre meant "concurrence" if the State government wants to grant remission of sentence and release the convict in a case investigated by CBI.

--IANS

pk/rn/vt

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 27 2016 | 8:56 PM IST

Next Story