Upward mobility falls sharply in US since 1940

Image
IANS New York
Last Updated : Apr 25 2017 | 2:42 PM IST

The probability for children to attain a higher income than their parents has dropped dramatically in the US -- from more than 90 per cent for children born in 1940 to 50 per cent for those born in the 1980s, say researchers including one of Indian origin.

The findings, published in the journal Science, revealed that restoring economic mobility would require, in part, more equal economic redistribution.

"Increasing GDP growth rates alone cannot restore absolute mobility to the rates experienced by children born in the 1940s," the researchers said.

"However, distributing current GDP growth more equally across income groups as in the 1940 birth cohort would reverse more than 70 per cent of the decline in mobility," the study added.

These results imply that reviving the "American dream" of high rates of absolute mobility would require economic growth that is shared more broadly across the income distribution.

The "American Dream" promises that hard work and opportunity will lead to a better life and that even those born to low-income families can "rise above the ranks" with sufficient effort.

Despite much interest in economic mobility, however, studying it over generations remains challenging, mainly because of the lack of large, high-quality datasets in the US linking children to their parents.

To overcome these gaps in data, Raj Chetty from Stanford University and his colleagues took a sophisticated approach that combines data from the US Census and Current Population Survey with tax records, adjusting for inflation and other confounding variables.

They found that the fraction of children earning more than their parents fell from 92 per cent in the 1940 birth cohort to 50 per cent in the 1984 birth cohort.

Economic mobility fell most sharply in the industrial Midwest (Indiana, Illinois) while the smallest declines occurred in states such as Massachusetts, New York and Montana.

Increasing GDP growth without changing the current distribution of growth would only have modest effects on rates of absolute mobility, the researchers said.

--IANS

gb/mr

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 25 2017 | 2:34 PM IST

Next Story